Sunday, December 30, 2012

President Awards a 'Do Nothing' Congress and VP Biden a Raise Before the Fiscal Cliff! Dive!

If we were in such bad shape financially, why is the President still spending?   

After rushing back from his Christmas vacation in Hawaii, the President made a speech concerning the results of the last-minute 'fiscal cliff' meeting.  During that speech the President forgot to mention that he's signed an Executive Order on the day before, calling for a pay increase gift to federal workers, and Vice President Joe Biden.  Also, returning members of Congress will receive a small increase. There was no mention of merit in granting this pay raise.  

The President willfully and arrogantly presides over spending as in the days of Louis XVI of France, while pretending to fight for the middle class. In this instance, the President spends and the middle class' taxes goes up even more.

Friday's last minute meeting was between President Barack Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to negotiate a deal to avert the quickly-approaching “fiscal cliff,” a combination of tax increases and deep spending cuts set to take effect next year unless Congress comes up with a budget plan.


Pay Raises Detail.

Vice President Biden will get a raise, and take home $231,900 before taxes next year. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) will get $224,600 next year, up from $223,500, while Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) will take in $194,400, up from $193,400.

Wake up America!  You're being hoodwinked, deceived and robbed blind by the old shell game.





~Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org




Friday, December 28, 2012

200 Utah Teachers Take Free Firearms Training Class


The Main Stream Media would love to make NRA President, Wayne Lapierre appear to be crazy for suggesting armed security in every school, but, these Utah teachers don't agree!

Published December 28, 2012

  • utahtrain.jpg

Kasey Hansen, a special education teacher from Salt Lake City, Utah, says she would take a bullet for any of her students, but if faced with a gunman threatening her class, she would rather be able to shoot back. Dec. 27, 2012: Clark Aposhian, President of Utah Shooting Sport Council, demonstrates with a plastic gun during concealed-weapons training for 200 Utah teachers.

SALT LAKE CITY –  Gun-rights advocates in Utah offered six hours of training Thursday in handling concealed weapons for hundreds of Utah teachers in the wake of the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut.

The latest effort to arm teachers to confront school assailants was organized by the Utah Shooting Sports Council, which hosted the training session to help educators become eligible for concealed firearm permits, FOX 13 News reported.

More than 200 teachers flocked to the training class in the Salt Lake City suburb of West Valley City. Raye Ann Blauer, a kindergarten teacher, told FOX 13 she is considering using her permit to carry a firearm at school.

“[A]fter everything that happened in Connecticut, I want to be aware of how I can help in the classroom and protect my kids and whatnot. Be aware,” Blauer said. “I think it’s really smart. Especially with everything that’s happened lately.”  English teacher Kevin Leatherbarrow holds a license to carry a concealed weapon and doesn't see anything wrong with arming teachers in the aftermath of the deadly Connecticut school shooting.
"We're sitting ducks," said Leatherbarrow, who works at a Utah charter school. "You don't have a chance in hell. You're dead -- no ifs, ands or buts."

In Ohio, a firearms group said it was launching a test program in tactical firearms training for 24 teachers. The Arizona attorney general is proposing a change to state law to allow an educator in each school to carry a gun.

The moves come after the National Rifle Association proposed placing an armed officer at each of the nation's schools after a gunman on Dec. 14 killed 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

There are already police officers in some of the nation's schools. Parents and educators, however, have questioned how safe the NRA proposal would keep kids, whether it would be economically feasible and how it would alter student life.
Some educators say it is dangerous to allow guns. Among the dangers are teachers being overpowered for their weapons or students getting them and accidentally or purposely shooting classmates.

"It's a terrible idea," said Carol Lear, a chief lawyer for the Utah Office of Education. "It's a horrible, terrible, no-good, rotten idea." Utah educators say they would ban guns if they could, but legislators left them with no choice. State law forbids schools, districts or college campuses from imposing their own gun restrictions.

Educators say they have no way of knowing how many teachers are armed. Gun-rights advocates estimate 1 percent of Utah teachers, or 240, are licensed to carry concealed weapons. It's not known how many do so at school.

Gun-rights advocates say teachers can act more quickly than law enforcement in the critical first few minutes to protect children from the kind of deadly shooting that took place in Connecticut.

"We're not suggesting that teachers roam the halls" for an armed intruder, said Clark Aposhian, chairman of the Utah Shooting Sports Council, the state's leading gun lobby. "They should lock down the classroom. But a gun is one more option if the shooter" breaks into a classroom, he said.

The council said it would waive its $50 fee for the training. Instruction will feature plastic guns and a major emphasis will be for people who are facing deadly threats to announce they have a gun and retreat or take cover before trying to shoot, he said. 
"Mass shootings may still be rare, but that doesn't help you when the monster comes in." At the class, teachers offered their fingerprints for a permit as an instructor in the "psychology of mass violence" kicked off the gun class.

"I just bought a bra holster," said Jessica Fiveash, a 32-year-old Utah teacher and wife of a retired Army sergeant who grew up shooting and said she had no hesitation packing a gun at school. "Women can't really carry a gun on their hip." 

Utah is among few states that let people carry licensed concealed weapons into public schools without exception, the National Conference of State Legislatures says in a 2012 compendium of state gun laws.

Leatherbarrow said he often felt threatened while working at an inner-city school in Buffalo, N.Y., where he got a license to carry a pistol. He moved less than a year ago to Utah, where he feels safer. 

But he said gun violence can break out anywhere. He said he was highly trained in handling guns -- and was taking criticism from parents who don't appreciate his views on school safety.

"I'm in agreement not everybody should be carrying firearms in school. They're not trained. But for some parents to think we're cowboys, that frustrates me," he said. "I wish parents would understand."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/28/teachers-in-utah-ohio-get-free-gun-training/#ixzz2GMlAtetv

Brought to you by, CharlottePAC.org

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Supreme Court Denies Hobby Lobby Request for Reprieve from Health Care Mandate

Our media is becoming known for sensationalizing article headings for more readerships.  One must read almost all the way to the bottom of the article to learn that the Supreme Court only denied the request for an injunction while legal battle on the merits plays out until the Court hears and rules on the other 40 cases pending.

Remember this figure at the end of the year:  Hobby Lobby currently has 13,000 full-time employees across more than 500 stores.

But, what do you want to bet that the currently 13,000 full-time employees and their families will either not be working or will only work part time in 2013 because of the Obamacare tax.

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby request for reprieve from health care mandate

Published December 26, 2012
FoxNews.com

The Supreme Court has denied a request by Hobby Lobby to shield the company from the so-called contraceptive mandate while its legal battle plays out, after a federal court last week similarly ruled against the Christian-owned company.

The lower court had earlier refused to protect the company from an Obamacare-tied requirement to provide contraceptive coverage, and the fines that come with it for not complying.

CEO David Green, who had taken his case to the appeals court after losing in a lower-court ruling, had argued that his family would have to either "violate their faith by covering abortion-causing drugs or be exposed to severe penalties."

The Supreme Court's latest ruling is not on the underlying merits of the mandate itself -- it simply denies the company's request for an injunction while legal battle on the merits plays out. There are currently more than 40 cases pending against that rule.

The mandate requires businesses and organizations, with some exceptions, to provide access to contraception coverage -- Hobby Lobby was most concerned about coverage for the morning-after pill, which some consider tantamount to an abortion-causing drug. Hobby Lobby has refused to comply, while saying the fines could add up to $1.3 million a day.

In its earlier ruling, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals said the company did not prove the rule would "substantially burden" its religious freedom. Though the mandate has exemptions for religious entities like churches, the lower court ruled that Hobby Lobby is not a religious group.
The company, founded in 1972, has more than 13,000 full-time employees across more than 500 stores.

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Could Armed Teachers Prevent the Next School Shooting?

The Sunday morning news shows are ablaze with the debate for arming teachers to prevent the next school shooting!


As a parent and grandmother, I want my children to be effectively defended.  When a parent drop their children off at school, those same parents look forward to seeing their children safe and happy at the end of the day. Our most precious resources, the future leaders of this nation!

Stricter gun laws would not have prevented "monsters" like Adam Lanza, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, and others from committing mass shootings, and I wonder why students, unlike banks, don't have the protection of armed officials.  

Armed police are currently in many schools, but, the police cannot be everywhere to provide protection and to make our children safe.  A shooter could take out a guard or officer with a visible, holstered weapon, but well trained teachers could slow down the mass killings in our schools, because the killer would not know how many teachers are carrying. Criminals are lazy...once they find out that they will encounter an obstacle in carrying out their crime, they will typically seek an easier pry.

Instead of heralding Ms. Victoria Soto, a 27-year-old Sandy Hook elementary teacher as a hero for dying while trying to hide her pupils; an armed Victoria Soto could have been heralded as a hero who was able to send her children to the safety of their homes after that horrific mass murder attempt.  

Connecticut has a ban on assault weapons and those precious children were not protected.

Criminals work outside of the legal system.  Additional gun bans will not stop them from killing. According to National Rifle Association chief Wayne LaPierre,  "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."




Eleven years after the Sept. 11 attacks, a growing number of U.S. airline pilots are armed, prepared to use lethal force to protect the cockpit.  More than  10,000 pilots carry government-issued guns on a voluntary basis, or about 10% of the nation's 100,000 pilots.

These pilots, officially known as federal flight deck officers, keep sidearms handy to provide one more layer of security and a last line of defense against hijackers.

To become flight deck officers, pilots undergo six days of intense training at a federal complex in Artesia, N.M., including weapons handling and close-combat techniques.

"We must speak for the safety of our nation's children," said LaPierre. "We care about our money, so we protect our banks with armed guards. American airports, office buildings, power plants, courthouses, even sports stadiums, are all protected by armed security. We care about our president, so we protect him with armed Secret Service agents. Members of Congress works in offices surrounded by Capitol police officers, yet when it comes to our most beloved innocent and vulnerable members of the American family -- our children -- we as a society leave them every day utterly defenseless. And the monsters and the predators of the world know it and exploit it."

If it is possible to stop the monsters from harming our children, I'd rather try this approach than to do nothing.  Connecticut has a ban on assault weapons.  The ban for assault weapons did not work to protect those 20 innocent children who lost their lives!  It is time out for applying band-aid, political correct solutions to solve problems.

It's time to implement solid solutions. Let's do something that WILL WORK and give our teachers the tools needed to EFFECTIVELY protect our children!  

It's time to armof educators. While this may seem like a bizarre proposition to some, in the tiny Texas town of Harrold, this practice is hardly controversial and it is effective.

~ Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org



.

'Beyond Question' the Economy was Destroyed by Democrat Policies

Flip-Flop!




Chris Dodd left the Senate in 2010. c last day in Congress will blissfully be December 31, 2012, but, they are leaving a trail of economic destruction behind them.

A new study from the widely respected National Bureau of Economic Research released this week has confirmed beyond question that the Democrat's  attacks on the housing market (the Community Reinvestment Act-- the United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, whether they could afford the loan or not) is directly responsible for imploding the housing market and destroying the economy.
The study painstakingly sorted through failed home loans that caused the housing market collapse and identified an overwhelming connection between them and CRA mortgages.
Let's take a walk back in history to get to the facts:  Setting the Record Straight. President Bush warned them!
-President Bush went to Congress repeatedly for years warning them that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were going to destroy the economy (17 times in 2008 alone). Democrats continuously ignored him, shut down his proposals along party lines and continued raiding the institutions for campaign contributions on their way down.

These are the Democrats who Placed us on the Path to the Fiscal Cliff with the Collapse of the Mortgage Market and with the Dodd/Frank Regulatory Reform Bill.

-John McCain also co-sponsored urgently critical reforms that would have prevented the housing market collapse, but Democrats shut that down as well, along party lines, and even openly ridiculed anyone who suggested reforms were necessary...to protect their taxpayer-funded campaign contributions as the economy raced uncontrollably toward the cliff.
-No one was making bad loans to unqualified people until Democrats came along and threatened to drag banks into court and have them fined and branded as racists if they didn't go along with the left's Affirmative Action lending policies...all while federally insuring their losses. Even the New York Times warned in the late1990s that Democrats continuing to force banks into lowering their standards would lead to this exact catastrophe.
-Obama himself is even on the record personally helping sue one lender (Citibank) into lowering its lending standards to include people from extremely poor and unstable areas, which even one of the left's favorite blatantly partisan "fact-checkers," Snopes, admits (while pretending to 'set the record straight').
-Even The New York Times admitted that there is "little evidence" of any connection between the "Republican" deregulation measures Obama blames, like the Gramm-Bleach-Liley Act (signed into law by a Democrat), and the collapse of the housing market.
But the mainstream media (MSM), which are  those media outlets disseminated via the largest distribution channels, which therefore represent what the majority of media consumers are likely to encounter, have spent years deliberately and relentlessly inoculating people against the facts, training them to mindlessly blame Bush for being in charge when Democrat policies destroyed the economy. 

While Democratic and Republican leaders trade blame as they leave for the Christmas holiday amid fading hope of an agreement to avert a year-end fiscal crisis that could lead to stiff tax hikes and drastic budget cuts, Barney Franks and Chris Dodd can sit back and enjoy the carnage they left behind and threat to future American dreams.

~Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Why Did This Administration Recently Purchase 1.6 Billion Rounds of Ammunition and Sniper Rounds?


Get Rid of the Second Amendment



In the aftermath of the recent Sandy Hook shooting, Progressives are screaming about how guns kill.  They all despise guns and ammo. They are saying that guns are the problem in America, today.

A strong strategy is being implemented to have an excuse to confiscate the guns. Assault Weapons are the culprit.  Actually, the ban on assault weapons is only a red herring. We've are being told from every corner of the media that the only solution is restoring confidence after the Sandy Hook shooting is to place more control on your guns.  Ultimately, allowing for the nullification of the 2nd Amendment is the true strategy. There strategy will succeed unless you recognize it, understand it, and take action now to stop it.  The key to their success lies in keeping gun owners like you in the dark.

But not exactly. There's one organization in America that's loading up on masses of assault rifles and enough ammunition to run a 7-year shooting war. That;s right.  The organization is the U.S. federal government and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has purchased a total of 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition to be used inside the United States.   That’s over five bullets for every American man, woman and child. It also includes long-range sniper rounds.

The United States of America was founded on the idea that an armed citizenry is the only thing that can be trusted to keep government honest, but that idea has now been turned upside down. The new message today is that an armed government is the only thing that can be trusted, and that individual citizens are all potential terrorists and mass murderers.

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms,” said Thomas Jefferson, “…is to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” The only way America has a chance to defend the Constitution and restore the Republic is to stay armed and stay vigilant.

There strategy will succeed unless you recognize it, understand it, and take action now to stop it.  The key to their success lies in keeping gun owners like you in the dark.


Here is the  original federal purchase document requesting all this ammunition at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/DHS_ammo_buy.pdf

~Brought to you by CharlottePAC

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Our Heros: GOP Governors Rejects State Run Exchanges

NEWS YOU WILL NOT GET FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA


Let’s dispense with the obvious: President Obama’s second term will be foremost about higher taxes and greater spending, i.e., the fiscal cliff followed by lifting the debt ceiling. 

Due to political gridlock, this administration’s real efforts will be devoted to fine-tuning regulations designed to go around Congress. 

Most voters understand that a second Obama term means the continuation of Obamacare tax and the Dodd-Frank financial regulations.  HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will attempt to use Obamacare tax as a slush fund to continue spending.

One of the ways Obamacare tax can be implemented is by getting the states to implement the exchanges.  If the states refuse to implement the healthcare exchange, the federal government must do it.  At this time, the federal government has not budgeted for implementing the exchanges.  They need the states to do it. They will have to go back to Congress to request more money.  If our Republican House holds firm and not approve the debt limit and additional spending  the governors will be a stopgap for the successful implementation of Obamacare.  

Our Republican Governors are protecting the sovereignty of the states
 Our Republican Governors are attempting to protect the sovereignty of the states. One of the strategies governors across the nation have used to oppose the Affordable Care Act is to force the federal government to run the exchanges. 


When the Obamacare tax  is implemented, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will own the states, businesses, and all of us by implementing the egregious regulations and fees of the jobs killing, Obamacare tax .  We will become her Subjects.

Read the original 2,700 pages and the additional regulations being written to implement the bill.  

Facts you should know according to Cato’s Michael Cannon: 
  1. A state-created exchange is not a state-controlled exchange. All exchanges will be controlled by Washington.
  2. Congress has authorized no funds for federal “fallback” exchanges. So Washington may not be able to impose Exchanges on states at all.
  3. The Obama administration has yet to provide crucial information that states need before they can make an informed decision. 
  4. Creating an exchange sets state officials up to take the blame when Obamacare increases insurance premiums and denies care to the sick. State officials won’t want their names on this disastrous mess.

All Republican governors are fighting for us while John Boehner is appearing to capitulate.  I pray that I’m wrong about Boehner.


~Brought to you by:  CharlottePAC.org


Saturday, December 8, 2012

Let's Go Over the Fiscal Cliff While Contemplating Gay Marriage


AP: Supreme Court will hear marriage cases

By Mark Sherman 
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme By Mark Sherman 

























Monday, December 3, 2012

Tax Increases Won't Avert Fiscal Cliff - Jobs Growth Will!

Americans could wake up to find a lump of coal in their stockings if the fiscal cliff isn't addressed before the holidays. According to a new report from the White House, taxes on middle class families will increase by $2,200 per year, resulting in a loss of $200 billion in consumer spending, if the fiscal cliff is not addressed. Similarly, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development stated that, if not avoided, the fiscal cliff could lead to a global recession.



This very serious situation can and should be avoided.  The President is demanding tax increases to solve our debt crisis, but Americans know that Washington doesn't have a revenue problem, spending on 
mandatory programs is the problem.  Any potential deal reached must begin with real spending cuts and meaningful reforms to mandatory programs. 

According to the Heritage Foundation, 62% of total government spending goes toward mandatory programs.

It is the responsibility of members of Congress to ensure that hardworking, middle-class families do not see their taxes increased in the New Year when about 40% of their total income already goes toward taxes. Additionally, the table must be set for economic growth, especially in the energy sector,  and to help ensure that small businesses have the confidence to hire.


It would be irresponsible for Congress to further burden taxpayers if the government’s spending addiction can’t be curbed. For example, President Obama’s budget projects that, even if we were to raise taxes on individuals making over $200,000, we would still add $6.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.


House Majority Leader, John Boehner spokesman, Brendan Buck fired off a statement, “If the President  rejects the middle ground offer, it is now his obligation to present a plan that can pass both chambers of Congress.”


The ball is in the President's hands.  Will he fight for America?  Stay tuned!
Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org