Monday, July 15, 2013

I'm With Alveda!


Alveda King: Sharpton, Jackson should stop ‘playing race card’ over Trayvon Martin
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece is criticizing the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson for politicizing the Trayvon Martin shooting and leveraging racial tensions to rile up Americans.
Conservative activist Dr. Alveda King, now the director of African-American outreach at Priests for Life and the founder of King For America, said she hopes Sharpton and Jackson stop “stirring up the people without positive solutions” in Sanford, Fla., and elsewhere in the U.S.
“I would believe that, by stirring up all of the emotions and reactions, I wanted to encourage them to remember the man that they say that they followed, to remember that his message was nonviolence and very loving,” King told The Daily Caller, referencing her late uncle. She added that she wanted to encourage Jackson and Sharpton “to talk about nonviolence and not to incite people with that race card that they are very good at playing.”
“Nonviolence was a very important part of the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr,” she added. “So, we want to encourage people to be nonviolent in their responses, to be thorough in their research and that justice must be done…We want justice to come, but we want nonviolent responses to this really tragic and terrible incident.”
King hasn’t made up her mind about the facts of this case and who is responsible for what, but believes there should be a full investigation. She told TheDC that she agrees with former Republican presidential candidate and businessman Herman Cain, however, who has asked for a full investigation instead of “swirling rhetoric.”
“I believe that it should be thoroughly investigated,” she told TheDC. “I believe that it should be discovered whether there was undue force. If Trayvon did work to defend himself, he was not armed and so that is an unfair fight right there. Trayvon was not armed and the man who shot him was. So there is a possibility of undue force.” (RELATED: Full coverage of the Trayvon Martin shooting)
She said her heart goes out to Trayvon Martin’s family and she understands what they’re going through. “I’m very concerned about Trayvon’s family,” King said. “I’m praying as well, and many members of my family are as well… Several of us have experienced death of family members by shooting.”
“My grandmother, Mama King, Alberta Williams King, was shot in Ebenezer Baptist Church,” King continued. “My uncle, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., of course, was shot. And, then, my dad [Alfred Daniel Williams King] was killed the next year, drowned in a swimming pool. So, we are not unfamiliar with these kinds of shocks and tragedies to a family. And, so, my first thought is to pray for the family.”
King hopes Americans won’t continue to “hype this up so much to a point and make all this big demonstrations. Of course, there should be an outrage and there should be an outcry. But, remember: There are many other young people who are at risk and many young people getting killed in violent situations.”
She said if her father, A.D. King, and uncle, Martin Luther King Jr., were still alive today, they would handle this tragedy much differently from how Sharpton and Jackson have so far.
“I remember when our home was bombed, and my dad went out to the people and he said, ‘please don’t riot, please don’t react violently, my family and I are alright,’” King said. “’If you have to hit anybody, hit me. So please, I’d rather you be nonviolent and don’t strike out.’ So, my uncle would urge a call for justice but he would also urge nonviolence in responses. He would do that, I can assure you he would.”
Moving forward on this storyline, King said Americans “should be watchful for racial profiling, for stereotypical responses.”
“We also should urge people to know that we are one human race,” she said. “We’re not separate races. There’s only one human race.”
King said the news media — which she said was largely responsible for Martin’s story gaining a massive national following — should remember that there are many struggles being encountered by America’s youth.
 “I would like for the media to be aware of how dire circumstances are and to be a little more compassionate in reporting and to be fair, of course,” King said. “To be honest and truthful, but to know that we’re dealing with some dire circumstances and this is not a one-time occurrence. There are issues involved here — certainly the racial issue is a question, but it’s not the only thing because we have violence against young people from those who are within their own racial communities and their own ethnic groups.”
King adds that racism still exists in America today, and the American people need to watch for it and fight back the way her uncle, Martin Luther King, Jr., taught. “This is the 21st century and we would all like to think racism is dead in America,” King said. “Actually, that’s not the case, still there are some racial issues that are out across this nation and so we have a responsibility as compassionate citizens of America, no matter what our ethnic group happens to be, to confront these issues when they arise. The best way to confront it is with God’s love, and if my uncle and my father were here today, they’d say that to you: ‘God’s love.’”

 

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Democrat Governor Opposes School Integration.

Fifty years ago today, Alabama Gov. George Wallace stood at the door of Foster Auditorium at the University of Alabama in a symbolic attempt to block two black students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, from enrolling at the school. The drama of the nation's division over desegregation came sharply into focus that June day. 


It was the same year that civil rights marchers had been turned back with police dogs and fire hoses in Birmingham, Alabama. 

Yep, on this day in 1963, the same year, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas., "The Stand in the Schoolhouse Door" took place at the University of Alabama. 

Two black students, Vivian Malone Jones and James Hood, arrived with a federal court order allowing them to register for classes. In the full view of the news media, Gov. George Wallace (Democrat) and National Guard members stood at the entrance of Foster Auditorium and would not let them enter. 

In his campaign inaugural address six months earlier, Wallace said: “I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." 


When Wallace barred the students, federal marshals arrived with the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, Nicholas Katzenbach. He told Wallace to step aside. But, the Governor refused, and Katzenbach called President John F. Kennedy who federalized the Alabama National Guard. Gen. Henry Graham of the Alabama Guard then commanded Wallace to step aside, saying, "Sir, it is my sad duty to ask you to step aside under the orders of the President of the United States." 
Democrat Governor George Wallace refuses to end segregation Marking the
50th Anniversary of Alabama's Civil Rights Standoff   
Wallace moved and Vivian Malone Jones and James Hood registered as students. 132 years of segregation began its slow decline to its end. 

That same evening President Kennedy addressed the nation, "This afternoon, following a series of threats and defiant statements, the presence of Alabama National Guardsmen was required to carry out the final and unequivocal order of the United States District Court. 

"That order called for the admission of two clearly qualified young Alabama residents who happened to have been born Negro. This Nation was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. And when Americans are sent to Viet-Nam or West Berlin, we do not ask for whites only. It ought to be possible, therefore, for American students of any color to attend any public institution they select without having to be backed up by troops. One hundred years of delay have passed since President Lincoln freed the slaves, yet their heirs, their grandsons, are not fully free. They are not yet freed from the bonds of injustice."

It would take another year and 8 days for the 1964 Civil Rights Act to pass. As a percentage, far more Republicans than Democrats in the U.S. Congress supported civil rights.
And for that, my fellow Black Americans are rewarding Democrats for Slavery, Secession, Segregation and now Socialism under the misguided explanation which defies logic, that every Republican moved over to a Party whose principles and values they did not support.

These are lies...lies and damn lies!


  

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Yesterday President Obama signed a law that gutted the reporting requirements originally included in the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act. Before these changes were made the STOCK Act required congressional staffers to disclose their finances to the public to help ensure they were not engaging in corrupt practices.
But on second thought, President Obama and Congress decided that congressional staffers should be able to escape transparency.
President Obama quietly signed legislation Monday that rolled back a provision of the STOCK Act that required high-ranking federal employees to disclose their financial information online. The White House announced Monday that the president had signed S. 716, which repealed a requirement of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act requiring the disclosure, which had previously been delayed several times by Congress.
You never heard of this political project to reinstate corruption incentives? Don’t be surprised.
Both chambers of Congress quickly — and near silently — approved the repeal legislation at the end of last week by unanimous consent, just before heading home to their districts.
That’s right. Unanimous consent, no one wanted to put their name down as openly supporting corruption while supporting corruption. And now President Obama has signed the bill guaranteeing a more corrupt Washington.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

ROBERT CHURCH – BLACK MEMPHIS REPUBLICAN


AS ROBERT CHURCH, JR. WOULD SAY, "IT'S TIME FOR REPUBLICANS TO COME BACK HOME TO PRINCIPLED LIVING AND VALUES VOTING!"


Born: 1885 - 1952

Robert R. Church, Jr., a political leader in Memphis and the nation, was born on October 26, 1885, at his family home.  The family lived at 384 South Lauderdale Street, in Memphis. He was one of  two children of Robert R. and Anna (Wright) Church. Education was important to the family. Mr. Church's sister was Annette E. Church. He was educated at Mrs. Julia Hooks’ kindergarten, by private tutors, and at parochial schools in Memphis. Further education was obtained at Morgan Park Military Academy, Morgan Park, Illinois, and Berlin and the Packard School of Business, New York.

He completed his education by spending two years learning banking on Wall Street.

Robert Church, Jr., returned to Memphis, where he became the manager of Church's Park and Auditorium. He later became cashier of the Solvent Savings Bank and Trust Company, founded by his father. Mr. Church succeeded him as president after his father's death. Within a few years, he resigned this position to manage the family's extensive real estate holdings. On July 26, 1911, Robert Church, Jr., married Sara P. Johnson of Washington, D. C.. They became the parents of one child, Sara Roberta.

Robert Church, Jr., was a delegate from Memphis to eight successive Republican National Conventions from 1912-1940.  He was requested frequently to recommend individuals for federal jobs in other southern states. He was consulted about political strategy by Republican Presidents and other high party officials so often that Time magazine referred to Church as the "roving dictator of the Lincoln Belt." 

In 1899, the city of Memphis did not provide recreational facilities such as parks and playgrounds for its black citizens, nor were there any suitable places where black theatrical troupes could perform. It was to meet these needs that Robert R. Church bought a tract of land and built on it an auditorium with funds he had accumulated since the Civil War. The park was called "Church's Park and Auditorium" and was located on a site of over six acres on Beale Street near Fourth and Turley. The grounds were handsomely and generously landscaped, and the auditorium, equipped with the best and most modern accommodations of the time, could seat 2,200 people. 

Church's Park and Auditorium was built by Mr. Church, owned  and managed by him. It was heralded as the only business venture of its kind in America and represented an unusual business feat for anyone at any time in history. An article in the September 15, 1906 Planter Journal noted that the auditorium cost $50,000 and that it was well equipped and had one of the largest stages in the South, completely furnished with all modern equipment, including a fire-proof curtain.

The Planter's Journal, established as a Cotton planter's journal in Memphis, Tennessee, also pointed out that the park and auditorium were without a doubt the most beautiful of its kind in the entire country. 

President Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, was a guest at a reception given by the black citizens of Memphis and addressed an estimated audience of over 10,000 citizens there on November 19, 1902. Booker T. Washington and party, who were touring Tennessee, also were guests there for breakfast in the banquet hall of the auditorium on November 24, 1909. James Shilliday, Herbert J. Seligmann, James Weldon Johnson, and Walter White, all officials of the national office of the NAACP, visited the location. 

The Lincoln Republican League, founded and organized by Robert R. Church, Jr., held its meetings in the auditorium, as did the first Memphis Branch of the NAACP. The Church of God In Christ, founded by Bishop C. H. Mason, held its convocations in the Church Park Auditorium before Mason Temple was built. William C. Handy, the world famous "blues" composer and musician, was employed to play for dances in Church's Park and Auditorium. The Cotton Makers' Jubilee, the black arm of the spring Cotton Carnival festival, was held on the site. World-acclaimed musicians Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, and Cab Calloway all played jazz there. Numerous school activities, including Lemoyne Owen College athletic games, dances, and other events were held there. 

Much of Memphis' early black history took place on Beale Street in Church's Park and Auditorium.

In 1993, the Church Park was listed in the National Register of Historic Places and was made a part of the Beale Street Historic District.

2013! It’s time we came back to our roots!  Republican policies have consistently supported  conditions enabling people to create jobs, enabling people to have higher wages. More importantly, those same policies support a stronger middle class.  Look around you! If you don’t believe me, how’s this economy working out for you? 

Ask yourself, “When was the last time you took the time to do the research and voted for the best person, even if they are Republican?”

~brought to you by CharlottePAC.org.

Friday, January 25, 2013

BUSTED: An Abuse of Power: President Obama's "Recess" Appointments


Is this a sign that sanity is beginning to be restored to Washington D.C.?

By Associated Press, Updated: Friday, January 25, 10:12 AM

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate to fill vacancies on a labor relations panel, a federal appeals court panel ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said that Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments last year to the National Labor Relations Board.

The unanimous decision is an embarrassing setback for the president, who made the appointments after Senate Republicans spent months blocking his choices for an agency they contended was biased in favor of unions.

The ruling also throws into question Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Cordray’s appointment, also made under the recess circumstance, has been challenged in a separate case.

Obama claims he acted properly in the case of the NLRB appointments because the Senate was away for the holidays on a 20-day recess. But the three-judge panel ruled that the Senate technically stayed in session when it was gaveled in and out every few days for so-called “pro forma” sessions.

GOP lawmakers used the tactic — as Democrats have in the past as well — to specifically to prevent the president from using his recess power. GOP lawmakers contend the labor board has been too pro-union in its decisions. They had also vigorously opposed the nomination of Cordray.

The Obama administration is expected to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but if it stands, it means hundreds of decisions issued by the board over more than a year are invalid. It also would leave the five-member labor board with just one validly appointed member, effectively shutting it down. The board is allowed to issue decisions only when it has at least three sitting members.

On Jan. 4, 2012, Obama appointed Deputy Labor Secretary Sharon Block, union lawyer Richard Griffin and NLRB counsel Terence Flynn to fill vacancies on the NLRB, giving it a full contingent for the first time in more than a year. Block and Griffin are Democrats, while Flynn is a Republican. Flynn stepped down from the board last year.

Obama also appointed Cordray on the same day.

The court’s decision is a victory for Republicans and business groups that have been attacking the labor board for issuing a series of decisions and rules that make it easier for the nation’s labor unions to organize new members.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

‘No Budget No Pay’: House Votes To Hold Its Own Salaries If Budget Isn’t Passed


Well, this one should have been a 'no-brainer' and should have happened sooner.

The House of Representatives voted today to approve a three-month extension of the debt limit in a bill that concurrently pressures lawmakers to adopt a budget or have their pay withheld. 



The bill, known as the No Budget No Pay Act of 2013, directs both chambers of Congress to adopt a budget resolution for fiscal year 2014 by April 15, 2013. If either body fails to pass a budget, members of that body would have their paychecks put into an escrow account starting on April 16 until that body adopts a budget. Any pay that is withheld would eventually be released at the end of the current Congress even if a budget doesn’t ever pass.

The bill will require the House and Senate each to pass a budget, and Member pay will be withheld if they fail.  

Okay…it's now time for the Senate to act. It has been almost four years since the Senate has passed a budget, while our national debt has skyrocketed by over $5 trillion.  This is basic to their jobs -- and required by law. Yet, Congress seems to think it's bigger than the law.

The fact of the matter is, if Members of Congress can't pass a budget on time, they wouldn't get paid until they did.  

Will this measure force our government to finally start working for the people?

~Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Democrats Have No Right to Claim Lincoln's Legacy


by Pajamasmedia

Published on Jan 16, 2013

The Democratic Party opposed President Lincoln and just about every other civil rights advance in the United States. They started the KKK.  So what gives the Democrats and Hollywood liberals the right to claim Abraham Lincoln as their president?

Is Hollywood stealing Lincoln's Republican legacy like they did with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr's relationship with Republicans?  In 1854, Republicans were not afraid to speak up!

Hear what AlfonZo Rachel thinks.




What do you think?  Is it time Republicans boldly reclaim their legacy?  Is it time for the original Republicans to come back home?

~Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org.

Please comment below or send your questions to Charlotte@CharlottePAC.org.


IN REMEMBERANCE: WHY MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR WAS A GREAT LEADER

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was no Pseudo Leader. 


When Dr. King devised a plan…he avoided putting a Band-Aid on the problem in order to make it appear that the problem was solved.  Instead, he crafted steps to bring about solutions and he appealed to willing Republican Congressional leaders for legislation to broaden existing laws to protect African-Americans.  They did not let him down. Dr. King’s plan, more than any event during that time, forced Americans to sit up and take notice and to get involved to bring about a change in our nation.


Group-think and the pseudo leaders of today are destroying communities by spending too much of their time cleaving to century-old crimes and stirring racial tensions. 

In his 1950 essay An Autobiography of Religious Development, Dr. King Jr. wrote that his father was a major influence on his life choices.  He stated that his admiration for his father was a great moving factor in his life; He set forth a noble example that he didn't mind following.

King Jr. often recounted that his father frequently sent him to work in the fields. He said that in this way he would gain a healthier respect for his forefathers. This was a driving factor in his civil rights movements across the United States.


In a 2008 Associated Press story, King’s son and namesake Martin Luther King III said: "It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican." 

As I will show below, his statement is not true and not supported by historical facts.

In 1956, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rev. Ralph D. Abernathy voted for the Republican president, Dwight D. Eisenhower.  He later told Nixon of his vote during a public meeting in Ghana, where they were attending a presidential inauguration.  

Also, Daddy King (father of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.) and nearly all of the most powerful preachers of the National Baptist Convention were life-long Republicans.

On June 23, 1958, U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower invited Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., to the White House to discuss the progress he was making on Civil Rights. Other African American leaders in the meeting included Roy Wilkins, Lester Granger and A. Philip Randolph.

Dr. King’s niece, Alveda C. King, a founder of the group King for America, also verified, "My uncle, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., during his lifetime, was a Republican." It is easily verifiable that MLK subscribed to Republican values, such as freedom, self-reliance and liberty, and that most black voters before 1960 associated themselves with the Grand Old Party -- the Party of Lincoln -- that passed the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution ending slavery and guaranteeing equal rights in the 19th century.   

 Dr. Kenneth W. Goings, professor and past chairman of the Department of African American and African Studies at Ohio State University, said in an email message that King may have had to register as a Republican to vote in Alabama in the 1950s. Goings said: "Daddy King was a Republican as were most African Americans in the South until the early 1940s. But the combination of Dem. Party outreach and Republican Southern strategy meant that by the 1950s the South was well on the way to the split that is evident now. I’ve not seen any written evidence that MLK Jr. was a Republican, but if he registered to vote it would have been as a Republican in Alabama simply because the Dems. would not allow black voters." My Lord, Black Americans, wake up! "Dems would not allow black voters"?!

To show his appreciation to President Kennedy for releasing him from jail, Dr. King was strongly advised by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, that he should not align himself with the Republican Party.  Yet, he refused to align himself with the Democratic Party.  The fact of the matter is this, he had "very positive feelings" about Republican Richard Nixon in the late 1950s and "extremely positive feelings" about Republican Nelson Rockefeller, the New York governor who later served as vice president. Dr. King became "a very harsh critic" of Democratic President Lyndon Johnson over his escalation of the Vietnam War and "wouldn't necessarily have backed (Democratic presidential nominee) Hubert Humphrey in '68 had he (King) lived."

During my congressional campaign, I was pleased to see the responses from citizen voters in Memphis when asked if Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican.  Very few black Americans showed surprise. I spoke to quite a number of people who understood history and knew the truth in their hearts concerning Dr. Martin Luther King’s convictions, for others, it was an education.

I believe in my heart that we can bring about liberty and prosperity, starting in Memphis and spreading throughout the nation, as we get back to the true message of Dr. King, which is that of freedom, liberty, and self-respect; and judging a person by their character, not by the color of their skin.  Dr. Martin Luther King fought, not just for civil rights for African Americans, but for social justice for all.  That's what keeps his mission compellingly alive. He understood that the Republican Party of Lincoln was the party of freedom, self-reliance and liberty. He did not come to Memphis to fight for the sanitation workers so that they could receive government handouts. He fought for their right to equal pay and dignity, which included fair treatment on their jobs.

To whom did Dr. King make his appeals for freedom? He wrote a letter of thanks to  President Dwight Eisenhower for providing escorts and protection for the nine black students' entering Little Rock Central High School, an all-white public school, for the first time since the Reconstruction era, against the directives of Arkansas governor, Orval Faubus (D).  Numerous times, he contacted Senator Everett Dirksen (R-Ill.), who was a civil rights hero.  During his sixteen years in the House of Representatives, Dirksen voted for anti-poll-tax and anti-lynching measures, and ended a record-breaking Democrat- led filibuster, that had consumed fifty-seven working days, against the passage of the Civil Rights Bill. Dirksen stood for civil rights, in spite of receiving little support among Chicago’s black voters and he was picketed at his home by rights activists.


Martin Luther King, Jr. (left), Senator Everett Dirksen, R-Ill. (right), and John Lewis (far right) meet shortly before King's "I Have a Dream" speech during the March on Washington in August 1963.


Dr. Martin Luther King, Senator Everett Dirksen and freedom fighters from all over (which included blacks and whites), fought for liberty during the Civil Rights movement. Without their sacrifice, I feel as though it would have been difficult to obtain the type of life, or educational and employment opportunities that I have had. I'm not even sure if I'd be alive today, if it had not been for those heroic freedom fighters.

What Dr. King did not know was that history would be rewritten through slander, fear and flat out lies about what the Republican Party represents. In order to keep the lie alive, it became necessary to keep tension and separation going between the political parties. Therefore, just before every election, mind-control accusations of racism would start, which invoked an unnecessary fear of a return to slavery. 

For example, VP Joe Biden, recently quoted, “‘gonna to put y’all back in chains.’ Quotes like that have worked for over 60 years in our Black American communities. What have we gotten for our loyalty? 

I grew up in a family which hung two pictures on the wall. The first was of Jesus breaking bread with his twelve disciples at the ‘Last Supper.’ The other was that of Dr. Martin Luther King, flanked on both sides by our slain 37th President, John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his brother, Senator Robert Kennedy.  While in school, we were taught to say the president's full name, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, which demonstrated the respect our teachers gave to our 37th president. We would also start each morning by reading a scripture and afterwards, pledging allegiance to the flag, which reinforced what we learned at home concerning respect for religion and our country.  Those two pictures molded many young lives, mine included.

The implied message was that Jesus, Dr. King, President Kennedy and Senator Robert Kennedy were to be our life models.  The Kennedys represented the Democratic Party. At that time, the party was viewed differently. 

Dr. Martin Luther King spoke loud and often, in the final days of his life, about economic injustice, about poverty and freedom. But, he would be appalled at how his sacrifice has been twisted to shatter lives and destroy the incentive to reach one's full potential, since the government has come in, like a cancer, killing the cells of drive and self-determination, and replacing them with a life-long dependency on what is falsely seen as the "cure":  the government drugs of welfare, free phones, free healthcare and yes, food stamps.  

Dr.  King very wisely labeled the last act of his epic, but short life, the "Poor People's Campaign", because he understood that while racism was (and is) a great oppressive force in our land, freedom can be had as a result of a good education and hard work. Millions upon millions of Americans are habitually looking for employment only to experience more discouragement and desperation. Sadly, today, many people have not been taught how jobs are created and the fundamentals of economics. The current administration does not understand how powerful an unshackled free market is for job creation.

I have been called a sell-out.  After facing the loss of every material thing I thought was important to me and to still be able to land on my feet, a better person than I was before, name calling has no effect on me.

Sellout is just a term that people use to enslave us and keep us distracted from real problems. We need leaders who will support choice and market-based reforms that will prepare us to achieve the American dream.

I am in the poverty-class for now, by choice, yet I have come from generations of poverty, dating back to American slavery in the 1800s. What I have, which they did not have, is an education, a chance to live in a country, which under normal circumstances would allow me to achieve riches, through hard work and integrity. 

And I, like  Dr. King, I have a dream. That dream is that Memphis, Tennessee, the place where Dr. King,. Jr. lost his life, in a horrific assassination, where the seed of the 20th century slavery began, will be the place where, though we have taken a 50 year detour, we will finally get to the ‘Promise Land.’
______________________________________________________



  ~Brought to you by CharlottePAC and Lynne Roberts, COO Frederick Douglass Republicans/Liberty Messenger





Wednesday, January 16, 2013

BEWARE: Liberals' Political Adversary to the Tea Party & the GOP!

Progressive coalition ‘Democracy Initiative’ aims to rebuild liberal politics

Image: US-POLITICS-ECONOMY
(Ben Jealous (C), president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), speaks outside the White House on November 16, 2012. (TOBY JORRIN/AFP/Getty Images))
A coalition of the largest labor unions, environmental groups and civil liberties organizations in America are banding together to combat policies they believe threaten all of them. On Wednesday, Mother Jones reported that the group of influential organizations had formed a “Democracy Initiative” with the intention of removing some of the biggest political roadblocks to progressive legislation.
The Democracy Initiative’s platform, writes Mother Jones’Andy Kroll, has three major planks: “getting big money out of politics, expanding the voting rolls while fighting voter ID laws, and rewriting Senate rules to curb the use of the filibuster to block legislation.”
Accomplishing those three goals, the group believes, would remove the biggest threats to American liberalism. Corporate influence over legislators, voter ID laws that target poor and non-white votes, and Senate rules which make it easy to block new legislation, the theory goes, all favor right-wing governance. As a result, groups as diverse as the NAACP, labor unions like the National Education Association, and the Sierra Club all see their interests under risk.
Kroll reports that the group would likely try to oust Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., “Public Enemy No. 1 for campaign finance reform,” when he runs for reelection in 2014. The group may also target major corporate interests—such as Chevron and the members of the American Legislative Exchange Council—directly.
The ultimate shape of the Democracy Initiative’s grand strategy remains to be seen. However, in its nascent form, the coalition invites stylistic comparison to its enemies on the right: the aforementioned ALEC, Americans for Prosperity, and other such groups. Like those organizations, the Democracy Initiative plans to bring together a diverse group with overlapping interests and play the “inside game” in an attempt to dismantle its opponents’ political infrastructure. Conservative interests have had a lot of success in pushing game-changing legislation through state governments, targeting powerful members of Congress, and generally trying to undermine the most powerful left-wing organizations.
There is reason to be skeptical that liberals can win at the same game. Left and right are not symmetrical—political theorists such as Corey Robin argue that conservatism is, at heart, a defense of hierarchy and “the private life of power.” The right excels at the inside game, in part, because they are the movement of the inside. Even if the Democracy Initiative could match its conservative counterparts in funding (an unlikely proposition given the liberal experience with fundraising for Super PACs), America’s political elites will still overwhelmingly be drawn from the same cultural and ideological background as its business elites.
That is not to say there is no value for the left in lobbying legislatures and fighting electoral campaigns on the federal level. However, national progressive organizations often miss the other side of the equation: the left’s biggest successes throughout American history have largely been the product of broad-based social movements. The civil rights movement of the sixties and the labor movement of the thirties certainly fought within the halls of power, but they’re most visible campaigns were fought in those areas of life not usually considered “political”: The workplace, the segregated diner, and so on.
Those fights were only possible because these movements recognized and fostered the link between seemingly abstract political issues and personal experiences of oppression. The whole concept of “social justice” is founded on this link. It remains unclear whether the Democracy Initiative has a clear theory of social justice, or whether it is even interested in social movement politics. If the coalition is interested in social movement politics, then it must be willing to engage with and grow local activism—to not just lead, but allow itself to be led, by local communities.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

President Awards a 'Do Nothing' Congress and VP Biden a Raise Before the Fiscal Cliff! Dive!

If we were in such bad shape financially, why is the President still spending?   

After rushing back from his Christmas vacation in Hawaii, the President made a speech concerning the results of the last-minute 'fiscal cliff' meeting.  During that speech the President forgot to mention that he's signed an Executive Order on the day before, calling for a pay increase gift to federal workers, and Vice President Joe Biden.  Also, returning members of Congress will receive a small increase. There was no mention of merit in granting this pay raise.  

The President willfully and arrogantly presides over spending as in the days of Louis XVI of France, while pretending to fight for the middle class. In this instance, the President spends and the middle class' taxes goes up even more.

Friday's last minute meeting was between President Barack Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to negotiate a deal to avert the quickly-approaching “fiscal cliff,” a combination of tax increases and deep spending cuts set to take effect next year unless Congress comes up with a budget plan.


Pay Raises Detail.

Vice President Biden will get a raise, and take home $231,900 before taxes next year. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) will get $224,600 next year, up from $223,500, while Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) will take in $194,400, up from $193,400.

Wake up America!  You're being hoodwinked, deceived and robbed blind by the old shell game.





~Brought to you by CharlottePAC.org




Friday, December 28, 2012

200 Utah Teachers Take Free Firearms Training Class


The Main Stream Media would love to make NRA President, Wayne Lapierre appear to be crazy for suggesting armed security in every school, but, these Utah teachers don't agree!

Published December 28, 2012

  • utahtrain.jpg

Kasey Hansen, a special education teacher from Salt Lake City, Utah, says she would take a bullet for any of her students, but if faced with a gunman threatening her class, she would rather be able to shoot back. Dec. 27, 2012: Clark Aposhian, President of Utah Shooting Sport Council, demonstrates with a plastic gun during concealed-weapons training for 200 Utah teachers.

SALT LAKE CITY –  Gun-rights advocates in Utah offered six hours of training Thursday in handling concealed weapons for hundreds of Utah teachers in the wake of the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut.

The latest effort to arm teachers to confront school assailants was organized by the Utah Shooting Sports Council, which hosted the training session to help educators become eligible for concealed firearm permits, FOX 13 News reported.

More than 200 teachers flocked to the training class in the Salt Lake City suburb of West Valley City. Raye Ann Blauer, a kindergarten teacher, told FOX 13 she is considering using her permit to carry a firearm at school.

“[A]fter everything that happened in Connecticut, I want to be aware of how I can help in the classroom and protect my kids and whatnot. Be aware,” Blauer said. “I think it’s really smart. Especially with everything that’s happened lately.”  English teacher Kevin Leatherbarrow holds a license to carry a concealed weapon and doesn't see anything wrong with arming teachers in the aftermath of the deadly Connecticut school shooting.
"We're sitting ducks," said Leatherbarrow, who works at a Utah charter school. "You don't have a chance in hell. You're dead -- no ifs, ands or buts."

In Ohio, a firearms group said it was launching a test program in tactical firearms training for 24 teachers. The Arizona attorney general is proposing a change to state law to allow an educator in each school to carry a gun.

The moves come after the National Rifle Association proposed placing an armed officer at each of the nation's schools after a gunman on Dec. 14 killed 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

There are already police officers in some of the nation's schools. Parents and educators, however, have questioned how safe the NRA proposal would keep kids, whether it would be economically feasible and how it would alter student life.
Some educators say it is dangerous to allow guns. Among the dangers are teachers being overpowered for their weapons or students getting them and accidentally or purposely shooting classmates.

"It's a terrible idea," said Carol Lear, a chief lawyer for the Utah Office of Education. "It's a horrible, terrible, no-good, rotten idea." Utah educators say they would ban guns if they could, but legislators left them with no choice. State law forbids schools, districts or college campuses from imposing their own gun restrictions.

Educators say they have no way of knowing how many teachers are armed. Gun-rights advocates estimate 1 percent of Utah teachers, or 240, are licensed to carry concealed weapons. It's not known how many do so at school.

Gun-rights advocates say teachers can act more quickly than law enforcement in the critical first few minutes to protect children from the kind of deadly shooting that took place in Connecticut.

"We're not suggesting that teachers roam the halls" for an armed intruder, said Clark Aposhian, chairman of the Utah Shooting Sports Council, the state's leading gun lobby. "They should lock down the classroom. But a gun is one more option if the shooter" breaks into a classroom, he said.

The council said it would waive its $50 fee for the training. Instruction will feature plastic guns and a major emphasis will be for people who are facing deadly threats to announce they have a gun and retreat or take cover before trying to shoot, he said. 
"Mass shootings may still be rare, but that doesn't help you when the monster comes in." At the class, teachers offered their fingerprints for a permit as an instructor in the "psychology of mass violence" kicked off the gun class.

"I just bought a bra holster," said Jessica Fiveash, a 32-year-old Utah teacher and wife of a retired Army sergeant who grew up shooting and said she had no hesitation packing a gun at school. "Women can't really carry a gun on their hip." 

Utah is among few states that let people carry licensed concealed weapons into public schools without exception, the National Conference of State Legislatures says in a 2012 compendium of state gun laws.

Leatherbarrow said he often felt threatened while working at an inner-city school in Buffalo, N.Y., where he got a license to carry a pistol. He moved less than a year ago to Utah, where he feels safer. 

But he said gun violence can break out anywhere. He said he was highly trained in handling guns -- and was taking criticism from parents who don't appreciate his views on school safety.

"I'm in agreement not everybody should be carrying firearms in school. They're not trained. But for some parents to think we're cowboys, that frustrates me," he said. "I wish parents would understand."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/28/teachers-in-utah-ohio-get-free-gun-training/#ixzz2GMlAtetv

Brought to you by, CharlottePAC.org

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Supreme Court Denies Hobby Lobby Request for Reprieve from Health Care Mandate

Our media is becoming known for sensationalizing article headings for more readerships.  One must read almost all the way to the bottom of the article to learn that the Supreme Court only denied the request for an injunction while legal battle on the merits plays out until the Court hears and rules on the other 40 cases pending.

Remember this figure at the end of the year:  Hobby Lobby currently has 13,000 full-time employees across more than 500 stores.

But, what do you want to bet that the currently 13,000 full-time employees and their families will either not be working or will only work part time in 2013 because of the Obamacare tax.

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby request for reprieve from health care mandate

Published December 26, 2012
FoxNews.com

The Supreme Court has denied a request by Hobby Lobby to shield the company from the so-called contraceptive mandate while its legal battle plays out, after a federal court last week similarly ruled against the Christian-owned company.

The lower court had earlier refused to protect the company from an Obamacare-tied requirement to provide contraceptive coverage, and the fines that come with it for not complying.

CEO David Green, who had taken his case to the appeals court after losing in a lower-court ruling, had argued that his family would have to either "violate their faith by covering abortion-causing drugs or be exposed to severe penalties."

The Supreme Court's latest ruling is not on the underlying merits of the mandate itself -- it simply denies the company's request for an injunction while legal battle on the merits plays out. There are currently more than 40 cases pending against that rule.

The mandate requires businesses and organizations, with some exceptions, to provide access to contraception coverage -- Hobby Lobby was most concerned about coverage for the morning-after pill, which some consider tantamount to an abortion-causing drug. Hobby Lobby has refused to comply, while saying the fines could add up to $1.3 million a day.

In its earlier ruling, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals said the company did not prove the rule would "substantially burden" its religious freedom. Though the mandate has exemptions for religious entities like churches, the lower court ruled that Hobby Lobby is not a religious group.
The company, founded in 1972, has more than 13,000 full-time employees across more than 500 stores.